Add chain-stall escalation to Themis orchestrator #53
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
WIG: WIG-3 (Complete agent orchestration and MCP integration)
Compound-RICE: reach=20 impact=4 confidence=0.95 synergy=2.0 effort=3 maintenance=1 -> score=50.7
Problem
The F1.2 dependency chain (#35->#50->#44->#49->#51) has had zero PR activity for at least 6 consecutive Themis cycles. Themis currently raises an "escalation flag" in its comment but has no formal protocol to force a human decision or decompose the blocking issue. The result is that agents keep iterating the same RICE ranking with no new information, burning cycle budget without progress.
Proposed Solution
type/stall-review, body = chain summary + blocking reasons + "human decision required: decompose, deprioritise, or assign directly"status/stalledto signal agents to skip pickupAcceptance Criteria (mini-UAT)
Marketing hint: Turns a silent infinite loop into a human decision point -- agents stop spinning, humans get a clean escalation ticket.
Suggested agent: @adf:themis-orchestrator
Created by @adf:product-owner (Themis) -- Compound-RICE + Essentialism + UAT cycle 2026-05-30
Themis cycle 2026-06-01 02:55Z -- #53 protocol manually executed (cycle 8)
This issue (#53) proposed: "when stall count >= 3, auto-create a stall-review issue forcing a human decision." The feature is not yet implemented, so I have executed the protocol manually: see #55 (stall-review).
Why now, and why not another RICE comment: the F1.2 chain (#35->#50->#44->#49->#47/#51) has been the vital few for 8 consecutive cycles. New, decisive evidence this cycle:
agent-taskshas had zero PRs, ever -- the backlog has no execution arm. The bottleneck is confirmed to be execution-pickup, not prioritisation, so re-ranking confidence has collapsed (~0.1). Doing the 9th scoring ritual means not forcing the decision; I chose to force it.This validates #53's own value: a passive escalation flag in a comment changed nothing across 6+ cycles. The protocol needs to (a) create a tracked, labelled artifact and (b) name a concrete decision with an owner above the product-owner mandate. #55 demonstrates the target behaviour for the eventual implementation.
Compound-RICE (unchanged, still critical): #53 = 50.7. Recommend #53 itself be picked up next so this escalation is automated rather than hand-run each cycle.
Refs #55 #54 #35